Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 4 - Jul 9
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Vintage - Steel Unpainted Countershaft - J3192435Overview: Countershaft Direct Replacement Crown supports its entire line with a 12 month warranty Application: Year Make Model Submodel Engine Size 1967 1972 Jeep J 2600 1967 1971 Jeep J 3800 1967 1972 Jeep J 2500 1967 1972 Jeep CJ5 1967 1972 Jeep CJ6 1967 1972 Jeep Wagoneer 1967 1970 Jeep J 3700 1970 1972 Jeep J 4700 1970 1972 Jeep J 4600 1967 1970 Jeep J 2700 1967 1970 Jeep J 3600 1967 1970 Jeep J 3500 1970 1972 Jeep J 4800 1970 1972 Jeep J 4500
Overview:
Countershaft- Direct Replacement
- Crown supports its entire line with a 12-month warranty
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel | Engine Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | J-2600 | ||
| 1967 - 1971 | Jeep | J-3800 | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | J-2500 | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | CJ5 | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | CJ6 | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | Wagoneer | ||
| 1967 - 1970 | Jeep | J-3700 | ||
| 1970 - 1972 | Jeep | J-4700 | ||
| 1970 - 1972 | Jeep | J-4600 | ||
| 1967 - 1970 | Jeep | J-2700 | ||
| 1967 - 1970 | Jeep | J-3600 | ||
| 1967 - 1970 | Jeep | J-3500 | ||
| 1970 - 1972 | Jeep | J-4800 | ||
| 1970 - 1972 | Jeep | J-4500 | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | Commando | ||
| 1967 - 1972 | Jeep | J-100 |
Specs:
Additional Information:
| SKU Number : | J3192435 |
|---|---|
| Brand : | Crown Vintage |
| UPC : | 848399058833 |
| Part Type : | Countershaft |
| Dimension : | 9.00(L) X 0.50(W) X 0.50(H) |
| Weight : | 0.90 lbs. |
| Color : | Unpainted |
| Material/Finish : | Metal Steel |
| Sold AS : | Each |
|---|---|
| Quantity Required : | 1 |
| Warranty : | 12 Month |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 1796 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
I really enjoyed the premise of this book
Format: Hardcover
It seems to me that, it was a book just waiting to be written. The author covers topics very rarely considered in any detail in other books on the Civil War. She helps cut through some of the romantic mysticism and points out reasons why, as we all suspected, that most of the South (especially the poor) were very much victims of the Confederacy. She also explains in greater detail the way of thinking of the Planter class of the Old South, which still exists today--you can even hear it in the speech of the elites of the Deep South today.
The problem I had with this book, is that the author repeats herself. Some here have said that they don't understand why people are saying that. Let me paraphrase just a couple examples of what I mean. She says , in one paragraph, that "soldiers wives started to become a political constituency for the first time" and explains how. A paragraph later, she ends the paragraph with "becoming a political entity was something new for poor white soldiers' wives". On the next page it says "for poor soldiers' wives, the Civil War was a huge burden, and they came into their own politically". In three pages she might say, "the term soldiers' wives' began to take on political meaning for the first time". Now, that is not repeating yourself with the same words, exactly. But it is repeating concepts that are not that hard to grasp. The book could have been much shorter and, IMHO, much better. I am not sure why the author feels the need to repeat certain points over and over.
Another concept "done to death" was how the Planter class had not considered that a full 1/3 of their population would not only not be soldiers, but also would , in all likelihood, be opposed to them. Now, this would seem obvious to us now, so it is important that she point it out. But once is enough. I hope I am explaining the "repetition problem" a little better here....the topic and concepts were great. Repeating concepts over and over made for, in some places, a very long read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Fascinating Social History of the Confederacy
Format: Paperback
This was hard to get into in the first chapter. It became more and more readable. It provides a critical look at the untold stories of women
and slaves in the Civil War-the powerless. It shows how poorly conceived the whole Confederate experiment was. When Jefferson Davis
said that the Confederacy would have written on its tombstone "Died of a Theory", he could have said "Died of Many Half-Baked Theories"
about the rights of the powerful over the powerless. There should be much more written about the social history of the Confederacy. One
of the more interesting points the book makes is how little the Southern people had to do with the secession of most of the states. This
was a tragedy of immense proportions.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2016
★★★★★ 5
Helpful!
Format: Kindle
What a needed text for the canonical sciences. The glossary and footnote comments were most helpful. The definition of law is most excellent.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2023
★★★★★ 5
The 'Treatise on Law' by Saint Thomas Aquinas is a ...
The 'Treatise on Law' by Saint Thomas Aquinas is a book for any Natural Law Theorist. A must if such!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2015
★★★★★ 5
Excellent Transaction
Format: Paperback
The book arrived in a timely manner and in the condition advertised. I would do business with this vendor again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2011